NC
Strategic Scorecard |
6.1.1 Long-term
Economic Growth |
|
Target: At
least 110% of US average long-term growth rate
Actual: 112%
of US average
US
Rank 2004: 28th (up
from 35th in 1996)
SE
Rank 2004: 6th (up
from 8th in 1996)
SE
Region: AL
FL GA KY MS NC SC TN VA WV Updated
4/09/06
|
|
| |
| Primary
Performance Indicator |
Percent Change in Per Capita
GSP
|
Performance
Trend:
The
trend depicts the degree to which actual
performance has approached the target in
recent years. |
|
|

|
Comments
• |
After
a few years of economic setbacks, NC showed signs of
rebounding by 2004. Its five-year economic growth rate
bounced back above the national average, but its competitive
rankings languished at 28th in the US and 6th in the
SE region. |
• |
The
impact of foreign trade policy continues to be particularly
severe in NC. |
|
|
| |
| Other
Highlights |
| North
Carolina |
• |
After
leading the region in the early 1990s, and maintaining
respectable growth in the late 1990s, NC experienced a
dramatic economic setback in 2001. NC’s per capita
GSP fell from 99% of the US rate in 2000 to 94.6% in 2001. |
• |
Nevertheless,
despite some temporary reversals in our economic fortunes,
our per capita GSP climbed to nearly 100% of the US rate
in 2004 and our regional rank in per capita GSP has remained
in the top three for over a decade. |
• |
From
2000 to 2004, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of
Cleveland, NC was 4th in the US (and 1st in the SE region)
in average annual labor productivity growth, a measure
of output per unit of work, and 17th in the US (and 4th
in the SE region) in annual GSP growth. |
|
| |
| Other |
| |
|
| Southeast
Region |
| |
|
| National |
| |
|
| Global |
| |
|
|
|
|
Goal
6.1: Promote
Dynamic and Sustainable Economic Growth |
|